Wednesday, October 2, 2013

srp reaserch paper

Christian Lewis

Is it possible to use nano mites, or nano robots to replace, or stimulate neurons within the brain, to allow a boosting of brain function with in the mentally handicapped (in short to include Alzheimer's disease, or other brain defects.)?
11th- Conceptual physics
9/23/13   




Lewis 1
The plague of brain disorders is one which has plagued many people for centuries. this issue has prompted much study, but little advancement. The current treatment is the use of  different  medications, which work with some cases, though do not for others. There is some pressure to find different ways of “curing” these diseases. An especially “important” emphasis has been placed on Alzheimer's disease, due to the number of elderly who get this disease.it has been speculated that 1 in 3 of our elderly will contract this disease. Alzheimer disease,degenerative brain disorder that develops in mid-to-late adulthood. It results in a progressive and irreversible decline in memory and a deterioration of various other cognitive abilities. The disease is characterized by the destruction of nerve cells and neural connections in the cerebral cortex of the brain and by a significant loss of brain mass.
The disease was first described in 1906 by German neuropathologist Alois Alzheimer. By the early 21st century it was recognized as the most common form of dementia among older persons. An estimated 35.6 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2010[1]. the idea of using these nano robotics in medicine  was first proposed by the scientist Richard P. Feynman in his 1960 paper discusses the possible use of the technology is currently a hot topic for discussion , mainly because you are in theory placing robots inside somebodies head, and testing the outcome. To be frank, there is little research done in the field , most of the applications are based on using this to create antibodies. although there is a thought that by placing some nanometer copper wires( copper wires that are nano meters in diameter) they may be able to “sync” the cell endings, and use them to transfer the electrical synapses, also called neuronal junction,  the site of transmission of electric nerve impulses between two nerve cells (neurons) or between a neuron and a gland or muscle cell (effector)[In more-complex protozoans,
Lewis 2
specialized cellular structures, or organelles, serve as receptors of stimulus and as effectors of response. Receptors include stiff sensory bristles in ciliates and the light-sensitive eyespots of flagellates]. A synaptic connection between a neuron and a muscle cell is called a neuromuscular junction.
At a chemical synapse each ending, or terminal, of a nerve fibre (presynaptic fibre) swells to form a knoblike structure that is separated from the fibre of an adjacent neuron, called a postsynaptic fibre, by a microscopic space called the synaptic cleft. The typical synaptic cleft is about 0.02 micron wide. The arrival of a nerve impulse at the presynaptic terminals causes the movement toward the presynaptic membrane of membrane-bound sacs, or synaptic vesicles, which fuse with the membrane and release a chemical substance called a neurotransmitter. This substance transmits the nerve impulse to the postsynaptic fibre by diffusing across the synaptic cleft and binding to receptor molecules on the postsynaptic membrane. The chemical binding action alters the shape of the receptors, initiating a series of reactions that open channel-shaped protein molecules. Electrically charged ions then flow through the channels into or out of the neuron. This sudden shift of electric charge across the postsynaptic membrane changes the electric polarization of the membrane, producing the postsynaptic potential, or PSP. If the net flow of positively charged ions into the cell is large enough, then the PSP is excitatory; that is, it can lead to the generation of a new nerve impulse, called an action potential.
Once they have been released and have bound to postsynaptic receptors, neurotransmitter molecules are immediately deactivated by enzymes in the synaptic cleft; they are also taken up by receptors in the presynaptic membrane and recycled. This process causes a series of brief transmission events, each one taking place in only 0.5 to 4.0 milliseconds.
Lewis 3
A single neurotransmitter may elicit different responses from different receptors.For Example ,norepinephrine, a common neurotransmitter in the autonomic nervous system, binds to some
receptors that excite nervous transmission and to others that inhibit it. The membrane of a postsynaptic fibre has many different kinds of receptors, and some presynaptic terminals release more than one type of neurotransmitter. Also, each postsynaptic fibre may form hundreds of competing synapses with many neurons. These variables account for the complex responses of the nervous system to any given stimulus. The synapse, with its neurotransmitter, acts as a physiological valve, directing the conduction of nerve impulses in regular circuits and preventing random or chaotic stimulation of nerves.
Electric synapses allow direct communications between neurons whose membranes are fused by permitting ions to flow between the cells through channels called gap junctions. Found in invertebrates and lower vertebrates, gap junctions allow faster synaptic transmission as well as the synchronization of entire groups of neurons. Gap junctions are also found in the human body, most often between cells in most organs and between glial cells of the nervous system. Chemical transmission seems to have evolved in large and complex vertebrate nervous systems, where transmission of multiple messages over longer distances is required.[1]


Lewis 4
Citations
. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/[1]
Feynman, R. P. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/1976/1/1960Bottom.pdf[2]
these are the ones i've at least quoted, the latter of the two was my main reference. the encyclopedia was used to help gain definitions, and historical facts, and information. tthere are several other papers which i read, urls listed below
Christian Lewis

Is it possible to use nano mites, or nano robots to replace, or stimulate neurons within the brain, to allow a boosting of brain function with in the mentally handicapped (in short to include Alzheimer's disease, or other brain defects.)?
11th- Conceptual physics
9/23/13   




Lewis 1
The plague of brain disorders is one which has plagued many people for centuries. this issue has prompted much study, but little advancement. The current treatment is the use of  different  medications, which work with some cases, though do not for others. There is some pressure to find different ways of “curing” these diseases. An especially “important” emphasis has been placed on Alzheimer's disease, due to the number of elderly who get this disease.it has been speculated that 1 in 3 of our elderly will contract this disease. Alzheimer disease,degenerative brain disorder that develops in mid-to-late adulthood. It results in a progressive and irreversible decline in memory and a deterioration of various other cognitive abilities. The disease is characterized by the destruction of nerve cells and neural connections in the cerebral cortex of the brain and by a significant loss of brain mass.
The disease was first described in 1906 by German neuropathologist Alois Alzheimer. By the early 21st century it was recognized as the most common form of dementia among older persons. An estimated 35.6 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2010[1]. the idea of using these nano robotics in medicine  was first proposed by the scientist Richard P. Feynman in his 1960 paper discusses the possible use of the technology is currently a hot topic for discussion , mainly because you are in theory placing robots inside somebodies head, and testing the outcome. To be frank, there is little research done in the field , most of the applications are based on using this to create antibodies. although there is a thought that by placing some nanometer copper wires( copper wires that are nano meters in diameter) they may be able to “sync” the cell endings, and use them to transfer the electrical synapses, also called neuronal junction,  the site of transmission of electric nerve impulses between two nerve cells (neurons) or between a neuron and a gland or muscle cell (effector)[In more-complex protozoans,
Lewis 2
specialized cellular structures, or organelles, serve as receptors of stimulus and as effectors of response. Receptors include stiff sensory bristles in ciliates and the light-sensitive eyespots of flagellates]. A synaptic connection between a neuron and a muscle cell is called a neuromuscular junction.
At a chemical synapse each ending, or terminal, of a nerve fibre (presynaptic fibre) swells to form a knoblike structure that is separated from the fibre of an adjacent neuron, called a postsynaptic fibre, by a microscopic space called the synaptic cleft. The typical synaptic cleft is about 0.02 micron wide. The arrival of a nerve impulse at the presynaptic terminals causes the movement toward the presynaptic membrane of membrane-bound sacs, or synaptic vesicles, which fuse with the membrane and release a chemical substance called a neurotransmitter. This substance transmits the nerve impulse to the postsynaptic fibre by diffusing across the synaptic cleft and binding to receptor molecules on the postsynaptic membrane. The chemical binding action alters the shape of the receptors, initiating a series of reactions that open channel-shaped protein molecules. Electrically charged ions then flow through the channels into or out of the neuron. This sudden shift of electric charge across the postsynaptic membrane changes the electric polarization of the membrane, producing the postsynaptic potential, or PSP. If the net flow of positively charged ions into the cell is large enough, then the PSP is excitatory; that is, it can lead to the generation of a new nerve impulse, called an action potential.
Once they have been released and have bound to postsynaptic receptors, neurotransmitter molecules are immediately deactivated by enzymes in the synaptic cleft; they are also taken up by receptors in the presynaptic membrane and recycled. This process causes a series of brief transmission events, each one taking place in only 0.5 to 4.0 milliseconds.
Lewis 3
A single neurotransmitter may elicit different responses from different receptors.For Example ,norepinephrine, a common neurotransmitter in the autonomic nervous system, binds to some
receptors that excite nervous transmission and to others that inhibit it. The membrane of a postsynaptic fibre has many different kinds of receptors, and some presynaptic terminals release more than one type of neurotransmitter. Also, each postsynaptic fibre may form hundreds of competing synapses with many neurons. These variables account for the complex responses of the nervous system to any given stimulus. The synapse, with its neurotransmitter, acts as a physiological valve, directing the conduction of nerve impulses in regular circuits and preventing random or chaotic stimulation of nerves.
Electric synapses allow direct communications between neurons whose membranes are fused by permitting ions to flow between the cells through channels called gap junctions. Found in invertebrates and lower vertebrates, gap junctions allow faster synaptic transmission as well as the synchronization of entire groups of neurons. Gap junctions are also found in the human body, most often between cells in most organs and between glial cells of the nervous system. Chemical transmission seems to have evolved in large and complex vertebrate nervous systems, where transmission of multiple messages over longer distances is required.[1]


Lewis 4
Citations
. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/[1]
Feynman, R. P. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/1976/1/1960Bottom.pdf[2]
these are the ones i've at least quoted, the latter of the two was my main reference. the encyclopedia was used to help gain definitions, and historical facts, and information. tthere are several other papers which i read, urls listed below

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

My research question: is it possible to use nano mites, or nano robots to replace, or stimulate neurons within the brain, to allow a boosting of brain function with in the mentally handicapped (in short to include Alzheimer's disease, or other brain defects.)   

Sources:
                 Articles

                 Dictionary/Encyclopedia


Wednesday, September 11, 2013

srp questions.

1)Is it possible to cure celiac disease with a strain of flu virus virus?
2)is it possible to use nanonites as a  booster to brain processing?
3)is it possible to use an influenza virus to cure cancer?
Can i cure Celiac disease with a virus?

Monday, August 19, 2013


http://www.voki.com/pickup.php?scid=8445741&height=267&width=200


Robot Rodeo, Y’all!

This is what happens when police, military folks, and scientists get together to play with very expensive robots.


REMOTEC Andros contemplates the task before it

REMOTEC Andros contemplates the task before it Kelsey Atherton
It’s 10 a.m. on a Wednesday, and I’m watching a robot poke a forest camouflage backpack with a stick. Here on the southern edge of Albuquerque, N.M., in an oven-hot tract of desert, a dozen assorted cops, military guys, and national researchers, along with three sweaty journalists, have gathered to play with robots.
Welcome to the Robot Rodeo, an annual competition that is both more and less absurd than it sounds. More absurd because for five days, grown men and women with important jobs (military technician, police officer) use obscenely expensive robots (the machine in the image above costs $100,000) to defuse fake threats (a bombing attempt against the fictional “MIB headquarters,” which may or may not be a nerdulent reference to Men In Black).
Less absurd are the stakes: law enforcement agencies and the military use robots to tackle dangerous situations that might otherwise result in human casualties. But robots are complicated technologies that need to be tested in all sorts of far-fetched scenarios. Defuse a “bomb” out here in the desert, and you’re that much better prepared to address a real bomb threat.
***
A bomb squad from Doña Ana County, N.M., received this fictional briefing: A car drove up to the MIB headquarters, where a passenger got out and threw a backpack over the fence. The car was found, but the passenger ran away. The driver, now in custody, has warned of a booby trap and larger bomb still in the car. The team has 90 minutes to respond to the threat.
The squad immediately sent their Remotec HD-1 after the package thrown over the fence. Like most of the robots at the rodeo, the HD-1 moves on tracks and has a strong gripping arm topped with a camera.
Because the “MIB headquarters” was actually just a large trailer, the robot faced a tricky problem: the bomb made it beneath the truck, and a low hanging metal crossbeam caught the Remotec's camera every time its arm tried to move forward and grab the package. So the team got creative. Grabbing a nearby piece of wood, the robot began to poke against the backpack.
Poke it with a stick!

Poke it with a stick!: The Remotec HD-1 solves problems like a cave man.  Kelsey Atherton
After trying a few different angles, and a second stick, the robot was able to push the suspicious package out from under the truck. Then it wheeled away from the headquarters, fake bomb dangling in its claw.
The challenge was only half-met. The booby-trapped car was still a threat, and to complicate matters, all its doors were locked. A second robot drove up, the Remotec Andros F6A, which is the larger, older sibling of the stick-manipulating HD-1. (Cool thing about the Andros F6A: it can climb stairs thanks to an extra, narrower set of tracks tucked in close to its body.) The second robot set about the hard and difficult task of opening a car door handle without hands. Or depth perception. The team had just 58 minutes left on the clock.
For 20 minutes, the robot moved back and forth, angling the claw higher and lower, poking the side of the car and scraping the door. The task seemed to require more finesse than the Andros F6A was capable of. (An earlier team attempting this challenge underestimated their robot's strength, and had accidentally broken off a car door handle in the process.) Finally, after great effort, the claw latched against the door...
Latched onto the car door handle

Latched onto the car door handle:  Kelsey Atherton
...and with delicate effort, opened it!
Door opening success!

Door opening success!:  Kelsey Atherton
Mission mostly accomplished! With the suspicious package retrieved and the car door open, the Doña Ana County team no longer faced the novel problem of retrieving bombs from difficult places, and instead set about resolving the more routine task (for a bomb squad, anyway) of defusing the mock explosives.
* * *
Elsewhere at the Robot Rodeo, a separate mission was underway. Two suspicious packages, again in backpacks, were discovered in the narrow gap between a railing and a fence. The path was hardly wider than a sidewalk. The first bomb was found on the ground and quickly retrieved. The second, however, proved much more challenging. Dangling from the top of a fence, the package was difficult to reach and precarious to move.
Working together, a bomb squad from Farmington, N.M. and the 62nd Explosive Ordnance Disposal Company from Fort Carson, Colo., deployed a combination of military and civilian robots. Farmington sent out a Remotec F6A, and Fort Carson the Talon, a smaller, tracked robot that defused improvised explosive devices in Iraq and helped survey the Fukushima nuclear disaster site in Japan.
This challenge required a special rope-and-pulley operation that, while simple for humans, is incredibly complex for robots. The first part of the task required setting carabiners onto two rail-mounted hooks, so that the pulled rope would drag the package against the far side of the path. Here's what a robot setting a carabiners looks like:
TALON and Remotec set a carabiner

TALON and Remotec set a carabiner :  Kelsey Atherton
One of the trickier parts of operating these robots is that they each can only look with one camera at a time. In the above image, the Talon is further back, providing larger context and extra visual input for the Remotec as it tries to hook the carabiner on the loop. (It's like if people only had depth perception when someone else was standing next to them.)
Once the carabiner hooked onto the rail, the next difficult task was placing the proper hook on the backpack itself. Again with the Talon acting as a spotter, the Remotec extended its mechanical arm as high as it could. The package remained just out of reach, but the Remotec had one more trick up its gears. One set of the robot's tracks scrunched up, lifting the machine an extra six inches off the ground. (Imagine a robot standing on tippy-toes.) That extra height allowed the robot's arm to latch onto the backpack.
Remotec Hooks The Package

Remotec Hooks The Package:  Kelsey Atherton
A pull on the rope, and the backpack slipped along the ground, out of the narrow corridor. Getting the package off the fence was only the penultimate step; next, the teams needed to find out what, exactly, was inside. The Talon carried the package into an Open Vision Live Video X-ray systemset up under a tent, which, as you might guess, provided live X-ray video of the package’s contents.
TALON X-Rays the Suspicious Package

TALON X-Rays the Suspicious Package: On the ground under the tent is an Open Vision Live Video X-Ray system.  Kelsey Atherton
Inside was a cylinder, which the teams labeled a pipe bomb. Challenge complete! The judges, from Sandia and Los Alamos National Labs, asked a few follow-up questions about pipe bomb disposal, and then it was mission accomplished for the two bomb squads.
Next year, the teams and their robots will meet up for another rodeo in Los Alamos, N.M. (I’m crossing my fingers for bomb-disposal drones.) While the competition allows military personnel, police officers, and researchers to test the limits of bomb disposal robots, its greatest benefit lies in teaching the teams to come up with creative solutions in the heat of the moment. Even as the technology improves every year, the robots are still only as good as their human operators.
S.C.E 
Lewis, Christian
This shows an obvious need, with the number of homegrown terrorist bombings in the U.S. to date.The design of these "games" is to display an obvious cause.The best robot, this competition is a "show"  of who has the best robot. and this is designed to promote the use, as well as purchase of said robots. they contain true possible resolutions to bomb threats. instead of the risk of a man/ woman not returning to their family, a robot can do it, and minimize the risks to the bomb squad officers in the line of duty . these people train daily, many say it is much like playing a video game. only the cost of failure is human life.these officers are always training with many different bots. many have different  appendages , as well as strengths, but they are very well done, and well made. 
purpose: to prevent officers from losing their lives in the line of duty.
1) why aren't there 2 arms on the robots instead of only one?
2) wouldn't it be more efficient to train officers on all bots? 
3) what are the pros and cons of using robots?
Kelsey D. Atherton(Posted 07.05.2013 at 11:30 am)

Robot Rodeo, Y’all!


http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-06/robot-rodeo

fyi i apologize for the earlier post, please disregard the last post